Skip to main content

Pro-life* (Life comes first. Except when it doesn't)









 ^Women are innocent. Consensual sex for pleasure is not a crime.
^I don't even have words for this one..
^ I actually found quite a lot calling for death to abortion providers. Calling for death to the doctors actually bothers me more than calling for death to women. If I ask you to help me do something, it was my idea. To punish my ''accomplice'' harsher than me makes me sick.
^This one has many levels of cringiness to it. First of all, the amount of ignorance in the first comment about how our culture has been pressuring women into abortion. Abortion has been around for centuries. This isnt new. Women did it behind closed doors most of the time due to the stigma associated with it. He may be referring to the lack of social structures in place that would assist women who would otherwise either been able to prevent the pregnancy to begin with, or keep the pregnancy if circumstances had been more favorable. On this, I find it ironic that it is the same political party that often pushes against the structures that would actually prevent abortions in the manner without the need for bans.
Secondly, this is extremely patronizing and this person is completely ignorant of that as well. He thinks he is being kind towards these women, but his justification of it is that they are not competent enough to understand what they are doing...
^Yup, prolife advocating for death.


 ^And another one who admits that pro life is not what it appears. With a name like that, you would think they are for preserving all lives. Nope, just certain ones. Please change your name accordingly then.
 ^This was a user flair... This person would see abortion providers killed for lawful procedures. This sounds like a very dangerous person.
 ^I found a few more charitable alternatives to the death penalty. Instead of murder, this one just wants our mothers, daughters, and wives locked up for life.




 ^This person thinks you lose your value as you get older and are expendable. And then tries to put a positive spin on it with throwing a god into the mix for good measure (yet somehow atheists are immoral.)





 ^The 2nd commenter is absolutely correct. If abortion becomes illegal and considered murder, it would have to be tried as such. This would result in our mothers, daughters, and wives serving prison time or possibly the death penalty. 

 ^Yeah... women who want to get rid of a rapists baby or be able to finish school or get out of poverty, they just need psychiatric care! They are clearly mentally ill!


 ^Imagine being stuck in an abusive relationship, having a miscarriage, and the asshole calls the cops on you under suspicion of inducing an abortion. It will happen. It absolutely will.


^This is why the soundbyte that is calling abortion murder is so dangerous. Women with unwanted pregnancies are not murderers. They are exercising their human right to ownership over their own body and uterus. They are in a situation they do not wish to be and did not intend to be. They are acting in self defense and self preservation. They are ending THEIR pregnancy. Equating the act with malicious murder that can be refrained from with no impact on your life is not only untrue, it is an extremely dangerous accusation. Calling abortion murder needs to stop. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Fetal Awareness

  Fetal Pain This topic is being included in our wiki because it is one of the bigger considerations for those on the fence about where they stand on the issue. The ability for a fetus to feel pain is inconclusive at this point in time. One thing, however, is clear - a pregnant person will also feel pain at the time of onset of labor and delivery. Drugs can only be used so much, and they can wear off prior to or during delivery. She will also experience pain after birth, while she heals and especially if she has a c-section. She will be unable to take narcotic pain meds if she plans on breastfeeding as it can be passed through breastmilk. And breastfeeding itself, can be painful, especially in the beginning. And that is nothing to say of the pains felt throughout pregnancy, including the emotional impact it has on a person who is unable to access abortion and is compelled to continue an unwanted pregnancy. Likewise, the pain of having to give up the child, who by the time of delive...
Post a Comment
Read more

''Why Mothers Don’t Have The Right To Refuse Babies The Use Of Their Wombs'' & a rebuttal as to why they actually do

My rebuttal is to this Federalist article: ''Why Mothers Don’t Have The Right To Refuse Babies The Use Of Their Wombs'' This prolife article argues that prenatal humans have to belong somewhere. If not the womb, then where? ''For most pro-choice advocates, the right to abortion hinges on affirming that a pregnant woman has the right to refuse her child residence in her body. But then the question may be asked, if a prenatal human being does not belong in her mother’s womb, where does she belong? The answer? Nowhere.'' You can ask that if you wish. My answer would be that it is irrelevant to the very first statement. ''It is implausible to claim a child does not belong in the place she began to exist and the only place she can survive: in the nurture and care her mother’s body naturally provides. This has been the case for virtually all of humanity since our history began. The mother’s womb is the rightful place of a child in t...
Post a Comment
Read more

Parthood view of pregnancy makes more sense than the containment view

  This will be a summary of a journal called Were you a part of your mother? that discusses two different views on the relationship between a pregnant person and a fetus. This journal entry refers to the pregnant person as the gravida and the fetus as the foster, so I will be referring to them with those terms as well. One view is the containment view and the other is the parthood view. The containment view seems to be a fairly commonly held view, one that I have seen both sides of the argument hold, so I will be focusing on the parthood view. I believe that the parthood view has a stronger logical standing. I will be summarizing it below by following the four criteria presented for what makes something a whole organism and what is a part of that whole organism. Following that will be the objections and how they can be addressed. I will not address every piece of criteria presented, but will do my best to condense down key points of this 55 minute read. Here is a mini table of co...
Post a Comment
Read more